News

  • - 2005-09-29 -
    CIPPIC is disappointed with the Canadian Recording Industry Association's over-the-top conclusions drawn from its controversial surveys about file-sharing. CRIA's language is most telling: - number of times "illegal" or "illegally" mentioned: 16 - number of times "private copying" or "levy" mentioned: 0
  • - 2005-09-29 -
    Irwin law has published "In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law", a book dedicated to a public interest perspective on Canadian copyright law. The collection of essays by some of Canada's leading copyright scholars and edited by Michael Geist is now available for purchase or free download under a Creative Commons license at the Irwin Law website (all royalties will be donated to Creative Commons).
  • - 2005-09-28 -
    On 28 September 2002, Freedom of Information organizations from around the globe created a network of Freedom of Information Advocates (FOIA Network) and agreed to collaborate in promotion of the individual right of access to information and open, transparent governance. They established Sept.28th as international "right to know" day, with the aim of raising awarness about the importance of open government policies. EPIC/CIPPIC news release FOIA Network
  • - 2005-09-15 -
    Together with the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, Consumers' Association of Canada, and National Anti-Poverty Organization ("The Consumer Groups"), CIPPIC filed detailed reply submissions with the federal Telecommunications Policy Review Panel. The Consumer Groups' reply focuses on proposals made by Bell Canada and TELUS for radical deregulation and removal of important consumer protections in telecommunications. - Executive Summary - Reply Submissions - Appendix A - Appendix B - Appendix C - Appendix D - Appendix E
  • - 2005-09-06 -
    CIPPIC has received a grant of $30,000 from the Beal Fund of the Triangle Community Foundation, for public interest research and analysis of digital copyright law reform issues. The Beal Fund is a philanthropic initiative of Bob Young, co-founder of Red Hat, a leading open-source software company, and current owner of the Canadian Football League's Hamilton Tiger Cats. This donation enables CIPPIC to work more closely and effectively with other public interest groups to ensure that Parliament hears all sides of these important issues, not just from select stakeholders. The grant is particularly timely given the recent introduction of Bill C-60, an omnibus copyright reform bill that dramatically increases the rights of copyright owners while doing little to address education and user interests. The Beal Fund grant has been matched by the Ontario Research Network for Electronic Commerce (ORNEC), which also provided start-up funding for CIPPIC.
  • - 2005-09-06 -
    A New South Wales Court ruled on September 5 that file-swapping service KaZaA infringes copyright. The Court clarified that its decision relates only to the KaZaA service, and not to file-sharing generally. The ruling only covers Australia - key differences between Canadian and Australian copyright law, including differences in treatment of "authorizing" copyright infringement and Canada's private copying regime, caution against application of this decision to Canadian copyright law. KaZaA owner Sharman Networks has vowed to appeal the decision. - Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd. v. Sharman License Holdings Ltd., [2005] FCA 1242 (5 September 2005) - Australian Law Professor Kim Weatherall's commentary on the decision
  • - 2005-08-28 -
    Help us get a handle on the scope of the scourge in Canada! CIPPIC is calling on Canadians to send us your spyware horror stories! Here's what we need: - what is the name of the spyware program (if you know it)? - what website infected you (again, if you know where you got it)? - what does the spyware do to your computer? - what does your anti-spyware software report about the spyware? Send an email to cippic@uottawa.ca with "Stop Spyware" in the subject line, and your name, location and affiliation (if any) in the message. We won't disclose your personal information without your consent. We plan on using these stories to help us better inform the Canadian government on the scope of Canada's spyware, and in appropriate cases and with your permission, to file complaints with Canadian authorities. Want to know more? Check out our Spyware FAQ for more information and tips for protecting yourself in the future.
  • - 2005-08-19 -
    Justice Minister Irwin Cotler has announced that the Canadian government will introduce legislation this fall to grant police unprecedented surveillance powers over Internet traffic. "Lawful Access" refers to the lawful interception of communications as well as search and seizure of information by law enforcement agencies. Under these proposals, law enforcement agencies will be able to access ISP subscriber data, obtain interim preservation orders, and order ISPs to deliver up data subject to a preservation order, all without a judicial warrant. CIPPIC's Lawful Access Web page
  • - 2005-08-17 -
    The Washington Post reports that 180Solutions, one of the world's most notorious adware distibutors, has sued 7 individuals - including a Toronto resident - for using botnets to install 180Solutions' pop-up ads. 180Solutions alleges that the defendants used botnets to install 180solutions' adware on thousands of Microsoft Windows PCs that they had infected with computer viruses. 180Solutions has been widely criticized for its failure to crackdown on distributors using illegal means of securing installs.
  • - 2005-08-15 -
    Together with the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, Consumers' Association of Canada, and National Anti-Poverty Organization, CIPPIC filed an 86 page submission on August 15th with the federal Telecom Policy Review Panel. The submission covers a wide range of issues including social and economic implications of new technologies, consumer protection, access to broadband service, and privacy. Among many recommendations, the Consumer Groups call for a national Telecommunications Ombudsman, ongoing government funding of community broadband initiatives, and continued regulatory intervention to guard against monopolistic and competitive abuses by service providers. Executive Summary Full Submission Evidence of Dr. Johannes Bauer Executive Summary of Dr. Bauer