Net Neutrality

Net Neutrality


F.A.Q.

Coming soon!

Resources

Websites and Advocacy groups

Canada

US and Others

News articles and presentations

Canada

US and others

Academic writings and white papers

Government Documents and Submissions

Canada

United States

Policy Papers

Canada

US and Others

Relevant CRTC Decisions

  • Telecom Decision CRTC 2003-26: In this decision, an application by Microcell regarding alleged contractions of section 27(2) of the Telecommunications Act by Rogers Wireless and Bell Mobility was denied. The commission finds that the canadian wireless market is robustly competitive.
  • Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-33: In this Decision, the Commission addresses a Part VII application filed by Superior Wireless Inc. (Superior) alleging that its customers had been subject to unjust discrimination by TBayTel. The Commission finds that while TBayTel did discriminate against Superior's customers, the discrimination was not unjust. Accordingly, the Commission denies the relief sought by Superior.
  • Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-49: In this Decision, the Commission disposes of a Part VII application by the Quebec Coalition of Internet Service Providers in which it requested Commission assistance to address certain provisioning and rate issues associated with Bell Canada's asymmetric digital subscriber line services..
  • Telecom Decision CRTC 2006-61: In this Decision, the Commission denies Cybersurf Corp.'s application for access to the Quality of Service Enhancement Service of Shaw Cablesystems G.P. (Shaw) and PacketCable functionality of Rogers Communications Inc., Shaw, and Vidéotron ltée. The Commission does not consider that traffic using the high-speed Internet service/third-party Internet access (HSIS/TPIA) network is being given unequal treatment or that parties using the HSIS/TPIA network are unable to provide their customers with an equivalent range of services.

Other resource sites

Blogs

Other